psytones

^ Ok I don't know why you felt this had to be said, but Ok!! *it's important to take everything with a pinch of salt, form your own ideas, investigate if possible. But don't slag off information as mumbo-jumbo just because it doesn't fit your comfortable world view. . Ie. You can for sure investigate the Zeitgeist stuff and I promise you, you will find proof or at least indications of it being more then plausible. Zeitgeist just takes a toll on it all sort of and gives you the problem, profit. Every case on this conspiracy/documentary is backed up by information. How deep the rabbit hole you wanna go? Of course you can't eat it all raw but try to chew and swallow some. Not only does it at times make perfect sense of how it is escalating it self in auto cruise profit control. Are we ready for a total change of our out of date system? Just the idea of a Federal Bank which isn't Federal but Private makes me feel sick. Luckily, in my country the Federal Bank is Federal and the peoples property. People conspire to little lol I've seen conspiracy theories about the people behind the curtain being Satan loving virgin sacrificing people with homosexual rituals that fostered a new born and put it inside the first nuclear bomb to breed pure evil.. Then again, sometimes people conspire too much lol, and if it where to be true I think I'm not ready for that truth.

the shpongle one is ding!! MFG ~ Man Fearing Gods people, bring more.:

you see correct yet poorly Still sitting with your hand raised in the air?

. Conspiracy: Time Of Spirit (We all know them, if you haven't watch them be sure you do, because if your new to these sorts of thinking you will get a shock that could change your life and perception about the way we are living - For those who has a masters degree in Conspiracy, this is merely a overview, a gathering of the conspiracy stuff going on since .. forever. This was mainly triggered by the 9/11 tragedy) (You trusted him, now it's time to ask questions about the system behind..) Documentary: Earthling .. [Warning, Strong content - Extreme visuals.] The Blue Planet (Beautiful documentary about the life in our deepest seas.) Alternative: aLien dReAmtiMe (Listen to Terrence McKenna, one of our times greatest Psychonauts, speak with music and visuals about acid, DMT and life) cOlors oF iNfinItive (If you love psytrance because of it's complex structures and geometrical fractiles. WATCH!!) The Great Year (About zodiac signs of Egypt, Hinduism .. ) ..

ok.. I sure hope you see the person eventually

:clapping: is there a topic in the Art thread about album redoings like these? Or a topic similer?

Gregh On Earth - Sigelviveshsyg with added ambience?

yess !! this one is good, eh? I digged it, watched it with Fragletrollet (he's included a lot of samples from this in his upcoming album) and it impressed me a lot!

^ + one MattMan, i agree, even though my reviews are at times total jalla, I hope they give some sort of amusement to some people I think reviews you write about is also a positive thing because it can reflect the vibe of the album. I'd suggest you read my review of Arsenic to see what I mean, and also the La Mila review which is as cheesy as the album. I think it's nice when the writing style sort of reflects the music. But yes, concrete useful information is gold for unknown and new albums your curious about. But if I know and have an album I can read a lot of detailed descriptions, fantasy writings etc for fun. I remember PKS's reviews on trance.net, they where of poor quality, boring writing style and nothing exiting about them. But they did their job, was short and concrete of what to expect, so I enjoyed them for this fact. When I see reviews by Jon Cocco I enjoy the look and feel of it, but unfortunally I almost never read them, just skim (thanks Basilisk) through and read the end points to get the concrete information I'm after. So many ways to write a review (and damn time/energy consuming at times!). So many ways to read and listen. And of course we have the negative shit throwing offensive humorist, direct and fun reviews of Ie. Psyreviews. people love shit.

My vote goes for Ormions contributions, for sure! The rest sucks dinoballs. Except the one approved by some dude that made me giggle. http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=811298

fair enough =D you do see the person smashing her head inside another um.dimension?

yeah thats a good description of how I feel as well. Do you smoke cigarettes, drink coffee or alcohol, take aspirin etc?

^ust fun to read others opinion, basically. When I had an office job I would print out reviews and hit the can for a 20 minutes well deserved break

watched it on liberty caps and it was boring, long and had the most intense spaced out ending ever! Though, my friend had one of his strongest nights, never was the same after

Wharta? where can I hear this Artha? np. some Tricky track

Hallucinogen - Gamma Goblins (Infected Mushroom Mix) I don't get all the bitching about this being bad. I think it's great! :posford:

yes but its not cognat

who me? why? My avatar is a picture from the inside sleeve of SubGud

congratulations its a whole ,,world" inside that stuff. the music is only the bonus

I sort of tilt against not reading others to not get effected but its true what you say. I especially prefer not to read a review of someone else if I know I'm about to write a review of the same album. But I read it after ^^ I usually like direct writing so in the reviews of Ie. Jon, I enjoy his layout and DP I skip or foamread (whats the English word?) the first parts and read the end or Overall thing. Same in magazines or newspaper (games, movies, music) I like to read the end points. The recommendations if you will.

Yeah its a good advice Basilisk and I did sniff at one page like this around new years last year but halfway through decided to can it. Maybe I'll take a new look but right now apart from the displeasure details I wrote about I'm quit happy about the MySpace. I guess one reason is the self advertising job it does because of the ,,friends" boxes. I'm interested in doing something with this as a hobby as well as the initial idea of just gathering my words (+ hey! its nice to get a free of financially cost album once in a while, je?::=) Its fun to write reviews and when I've written a review I'm pleased with, like the Arsenic one, I get a good feeling of self accomplishment. But sometimes it can be very time consuming, about 2-3 hours from start to finish.

http://israbox.com/uploads/posts/2009-01/1...erwise-2008.jpg sooo beautiful and the cover art is also sweeeet..

wow really? Your like a music review hunter? If I ever hunt its to read reviews of albums I know and/or really interests me. Its fun to read what people think. Like just now I search review topics like this one I made and found a review Deedrah thread and I had to read through because I love that album. Other then that I'm not a huuge review reader. it depends 2 first for me e. I mean 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7