Jump to content

ouroboros

Members
  • Posts

    2297
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

ouroboros last won the day on November 15 2013

ouroboros had the most liked content!

Reputation

4 Neutral

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  1. meh, i know its personal opinion, but im not at all interested in hardware emulations of ancient instruments that have been done a million times already. i just dont see the point.
  2. actually i hadnt checked my email...wisik 4000 is out today. ok...im gonna go play with my new toy.
  3. karmafx is pretty good. buuuut...the new wusik 4000 is due out any day now...if you hop on the group buy you can get wusik 4000 AND wusik station for cheap cheap cheap. if im being honest though...reaktor
  4. hey everyone, i would like to announce the (self) release of my album: the order of things. you can listen for free...and you can download the entire album also for free. if you want to dl the entire thing, just click dl and you will be asked how much you want to pay (its a pay what you want kind of deal) you may enter 0.00 and you will begin a free download. if you like the music...it would be appreciated if you like my facebook page and maybe say hi in my guestbook. all infos and links can be found here: http://chaoswyrm.com/ thanks..and enjoy! p.s. - mods, i apologize if this is is the wrong forum, those rules are a bit tricky to figure out...feel free to move it.
  5. hehe...i actually think i was at my peak in my 30's if i could go back id def. pick 30's over 20's...of course it probably helps that in my 30's people thought i was in my 20's...i guess i was just a late bloomer.
  6. 1969 i miss my youthful body. as it stands i can easily pass for 10 years younger than i am (just lucky genes), but i dont *feel* like i used to.
  7. pretty cool....and also chronostasis is a cool name for a track...now ill have to make one...and mess with the time in it.
  8. lol i have noticed that on my own before. i figured it had something to do with the refocusing of the eyes. maybe you miss a tick while your eyes refocus so it seems like it takes whatever the difference is you missed between ticks longer? i dont know...just guessing. i used to be a competitive runner, and because of that i developed a very accurate internal clock. i can count off a minute in my head within 2 seconds, or can usually, accurately (within about 3 minutes) guess the current time many many hours after the last time i looked at a clock.
  9. i saw an interesting experiment once involving how we experience time. a man had a device on his wrist that would display numbers, it was set to display the numbers too quickly to be able to read. the man then jumped off a very high platform (he was going to land on an air bag, like stunt people do in movies). it was determined that during free fall, he could easily make out the numbers that were previously changing too fast to make out. he experienced time more slowly. im not saying that time actually moved slower, but that his experience of it was slower, probably due to adrenaline. the real purpose was to demonstrate that, in times of stress, when people say things like "time seemed to slow down", they arent just making it up, its not just a feeling they have. for them, in that moment, time did slow down. it has also been shown that young people experience time slower than older people. not entirely scientific i admit, but groups of people of varying ages were asked to count off 60 seconds in their heads (without being able to see a clock). young people consistently counted off a minute as being longer than it is and older people consistently counted it off as shorter than it is. so great...the closer you are to death, the faster it approaches. yay if i recall correctly is was brian cox doing the experiments for a tv show...but i cant find it on youtube.
  10. i only know what i read here radi, but using the phrase "so called physical reality", speaks volumes on its own. the lens flare has now been explained to you by several people, you have been shown other examples of it, the experiment of taking pictures in portrait mode showed exactly what it should have if the dirty/scratched lens hypothesis was right, not to mention the utter ridiculousness of your original claim. everything points to a simple lens flare and not a magic piece of old computer hardware...and still you refuse to hear anything. im not a psychiatrist, but radi you are showing classic signs of a delusional psychiatric disorder. i said it before and ill say it again: go see a doctor
  11. i always find it amusing when people who clearly know nothing of science make claims on the validity of the science they know nothing about. as far as my "insultive" language, no...i had put it aside for quite some time radi...i even came to your defense on an occasion or two. no more. im through holding my tongue with you. you are a cancer here, nearly every topic you are involved in becomes a fight. you are an abrasive, stubborn, aggressive, insulting, arrogant, pompous, rude, egocentric, psychopathic ass. you have little knowledge of how the world functions, either inter-personally or physically. if you enjoy your own personal "reality" so much, why dont you stay there and stop invading ours?
  12. you are absolutely right. im just getting sick of his shenanigans. the guy complains about this forum, and is oblivious to the fact that he is a main contributor to its downfall. im sick of him...and im sick of people coddling him, hes a menace.
×
×
  • Create New...