radi6404

I also agree that atheists should not try as hard to proove that this or that doesn´t exist and come with today´s scientific evidence, which is not worth that much anyway, since science makes new discoveries every day.

Such as not responding to claims and theories that are in respond to an existance of a soul or god in that matter. I listed in my post you quote examples of that like people not responding to people who explained that they could see during an NDE or that they could find things in the rooms, that could not be seen with the eyes.

It depents what you are watching. Videos on youtube can be informative or senceless, it depents which videos you are watching. The video I talked about was a vdeio originating for am sciensce documentary from a serious TV channel. The ideas here in this forum, denying everything that is connected to god are indeed not much better than the example of earth being the center of the universe. Research is important and answers many things, which become defined, but it is anything but intelligent and logican to question everything that is not defined. Arguing that a god does not exist or that telepathy is not possible is not intelligent, when people take a strong position to one site, without supporting evidence for it. It is quite funny how all atheists here or on other places and all "scientists" ignore the evidence that shows, they could be wrong. Some scientists suggest a theory and only deliver the evidence that is supporting their theories, not including the evidence that disprooves them. For example people say NDE´s originate from the brain and explain how it works, but don´t deal with facts, that blind people could see and describe things in a room or people who coud go to other places outside the room. Also with telepathy, scientists explain how telepathy can´t be possible but don`t deal with the events that happened in the past and showed, how some people were able to notice things with remote viewing. Some users in this thread do that aswell and I am wondering, why I am at all bothering talking here. It is not possible to have reasonable argumentation about a topic, when some people show only supportive evidence for their theories and when they are shown something supporting a diferent theory, they simply ignore it. @Rotwnag Feathers had great argumentative skills and had the ability to upset people and aktually make them respond. This is a big step, since many people here just ignore others, who are in the way of them, but he managed to make others want to answer, because they were affraid their theories would fall together like a bilding constructed with cards.

Man, you annoy me almost every time you talk in this forum. Whenever you make the effort to use your fingers and release something new, it always shows how smallminded, stubbern and ignorant you are. It is a big shame one user, which was a friend of mine, is not here. I don`t have the words and energy to argue properly, he on the other hand would finally make an end to such ignorant commends of yours, which show that you are an reallity addict. If you want fucking proove, go vist fucking youtube. I don`t make up such things in my mind you know, I get the information from somewhere and I saw it in one video, but that was about a year ago. Just remember, your ignorance and reallity addiction will one day proove you very wrong, then you will think about me. I am wondering why I argue with such reallity addicts as you at all. Such ignorant people that think what science has said, is the real truth. You are not any better than people, who claimed the earth is the center of the universe. Maybe, but maybe not. It is astonishing how so many users stick with reallity addict thinking and don´t allow for anything that doesn´t fit in their simple way of thinking. It is a shame that people really believe, that their simple way of seeing things is the right way and don´t allow for anything, that can´t be percepted with their sences. Anything a tele/microscope or a microphone can´t percept for most people simply is impossible. What a narrow way of thinking.

Well, because otherwise this believ could be just generated where other believes are generated, like the believ that we will succed/fail in certain things. Do you think clear or not? If a god does not exist, why would there be a special center in our brain for religious believs? What porpuse would it serve? I am curious to hear your explanations about this.

Some brain scientists have found that believ is taking place in one part of the brain specially dedicated to it. This, if true, would suppor the theory of an existing god even more.

Star Trek Voyager session 5 has many good episodes, probably session 4 and 5 are the best, while 6 and 7 are rather weak. The first episodes of Stark Trek session 5 have a great balance between suspense, detail and story.

I fully agree to that state ment and was wondering what he meant with the things he said.

Now let´s not generalize and critizise the different groups of people. I just want osay that the current methods of science for sure are not everything there is to know about the unierse, life and afterlife.

I don`t buy it people. How is it possible that most here want a lot of suspense in a movie or series, doesn`t the story mean anything to you? For me a very good story and great details are really important in a movie. For example a movie can be great even without violence and suspence all the time. It can show how people behave in the future, how the mashinery works, how people entertain themselfes and similar. A good movie or series can have little supsension and be great, just like some Star Trek episodes. How is it explainable that the crimila series like Criminal minds, CSI, Criminal Intend have almost no suspension and still have massive success? That contradicts with the wishes of many users in this thread. But in the end anyone has it´s opinion, however a balanced suspension, where the good ones aren´t suffering til the last minutes of the movie is in my opinion much better as pushing the suspension so high, that our nerves are torn apart.

Bulgaria has the most hot minearl springs in whole europe.

Now this is a bit harsh.

Well, I do look, but my look does not come to me, since I am not the one, who is limiting my choise of vacation places to one country from more than 200 countries in the world.

The only one who is talking bullshit, is you. You can´t impress anyone with your simple language and simple ideas..

you are right, I meant supsence and I find extreme suspence annoying, especially when the entire story is simple and only based on suspence than it is very bad. Movies and series need suspence and I love it in music, but the kind of suspence, where the good people stand no chance til the last minutes is bad in my opinion.

for me it is not about voilence or not in a movie. I like action and horror movies, I appreciate them, but I have a hard time watching them, when til the last minutes the good people have extreme problems defeating the bad. Some movies should be less stressful in that aspect so that the bad don`t always seem to have a big advantange against the good, it should be balanced. Great old movies with good balance are the Terminator movies. In my opinion there is some stress, but the good ones do not seem to stand no chance tilt the last minutes.

This thread shows what I´ve been observing for a long time now. Many people don`t have much of a personality and the only important thing to them is, please their friends and people arround them. Theyd do whatever neccesarry in order to get positive feedback back from others, don`t caring about their personallity. Otherwise this thread would not be full with India and Japan as a favourite destination, ingoring all the other beautiful countries, mountains and islands in the world. What about all the ruopean countries? The alps? Croatia? France? Spain? Protugal? Bulgaria? Romania? The Balkan countries? What about Africa, Asia (not only India and Japan), America? So many beautiful places and everyone ignroes them. It is hard to see for me how people list only one destination country. If this is your real personal choise, I am glad to read it, but is it really your personal choise?

I never understood why so many people want big stress in the moviews and series and the filmstudios creating the most stressful stories they can think of. They clearly use it to create movies and series commercially and ruin a lot of otherwise great series. So many Star Trek Voyager series are ruined by stress. Incredibly good charakters play their roles very well but you can stress almot to the last minute and it makes the series boring. If a movie has too much stress and the good people are in very bad positions I have a hard time enduring the movie and sometimes turn it away. I can`t stand extremly stressful movies, where it seems the good will loose til almost the last minute. Stress is by far not the only recipy to create a great movie or series and it ruins many good movies and series. Look at all the criminal series from the last years. Criminal minds, CSI, Criminal intend, the authors of these sereis don`t generate a lot of stress and yet the series are very popular and succesful, without the good seeing to loose until the last minute. For me details in a movie are much more important as extreme stress. In a science fiction movie that could be explaining the technical items in detail and showing interesting parts of the charakters. What do you think, is extreme stress good in movies or is moderate stress and a great story better?

That is impressive. I know this theory but never analyzed it further. To be honest this theory is the most doubtful of all in my opinion, but if you want to find hints, you will find them even for this theory. As far as god is concermed, have you noticed that when you prey, you can sometimes hear your voice in your thought as the man speaking in arch noa? Especially when you are looking at a Jesus portraid. I have noticed it several times and for me it is a big step. I have talked with other people and they noticed it aswell.

That is bullshit Imba, she was 20 years old so stop accusing me of that.

No, how did you get that she was a he? I did not say something that would lead to such a conclusion. She jsut wasn´t the most attractive girl, I was not in love with her and she annoyed me a lot with her delayings of our meeting, so I quid friendshiop with her.

I forgot you are German. The time when we talked about Rammstein was not a very pleasant time for me, at the beginning of this year, which is why I don`t remember everything that clear. We should get along better, when we speak the same language.

Hey Rotwang, here you are with that video. And by the way, people may be able to have visual experiences, but not describe in detail what is happening in the rooms where they get healthcare. Visuals in NDEs where also experienced by people, who where not able to see in their lifes.

Ion1zed, do you know more about me than I thought you know? You linked me a German Wikipedia article, so I assume you know that my native language is German?

First, spare your sic commends. i am not sick and my use of language is my own choose. I wanted to drink cofé with her and talk to her, maybe we could establish a friendship, just like some people establish friendships, because in my kowledge having a girl as a friend is something very good. A good girl friend, (not a girlfriend) is like a very good boy friend. I am researching, because I want to conduct konwledge and research human behaviour, I want to be able to notice why a person is reacting to certain things in a certain way and to other things in a very different way. With that kowledge I can help myself with new contacts and maybe even help others.