oh I wish I had english skills of an englishman.
but anyways yes I was disagreeing.
To compare koxbox and eat static:
eat static is techno, drum'n'bass, trance, psy.
koxbox is psychedelic trance. (some techy stuff nowadays eh? but I'm talking more of the mid 90s here.)
what's common factor with these acts?
the common factor is that they've appreciated and known in the psytrance scene.
and what do one knows, we're on a psyforum!
what I'm trying to get here is that the people who talk about these projects come from psy-community.
so, as I've heard a fair amount of psy, I can easily say there's nothing close to that mad sound of ol' koxbox.
but to say eat static is unique? From what I've heard, they are. But then again think of the scale of styles is in their sound!
Do you view yourself as an expert in the field of d'n'b, techno, breaks, salsa, etc?
I'm guessing not? well, not in all those areas are you?
so, to draw a conclusion, how could one know is eat static unique, as their sound is so broad, and you basicly should through-outly know most genres of electronic music that you could really say "yes, there's nothing alike."
as for koxbox-sound being merely psy, you can quite easily make such statement.