Guest Clargoa Posted April 18, 2002 Share Posted April 18, 2002 I don't see the point of having this contest at 96kbps now because people are posting links to their songs encoded at better bitrates...And sure it sounds a lot better than 96kbps. So if you've heard the song at 192kbps and the other at 96kbps it's a whole lot different... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dexium Posted April 18, 2002 Share Posted April 18, 2002 You raise a good point Clargoa... maybe next time the artists will have to supply their own webspace... makes sence to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ancient Posted April 18, 2002 Share Posted April 18, 2002 i think the 192 kbps fuckers should b disqualified, 192 is twice the quality god damnit!! its not fair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest AgalactiA Posted April 18, 2002 Share Posted April 18, 2002 ahh I don't care I guess if the track is good, you'll hear it in 96kb/s too - no ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Andreas of Amygdala Posted April 19, 2002 Share Posted April 19, 2002 Agreed... And if you use a decent encoder (top of my head: lame), 96kb will sound fine - if your mix does, that is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ancient Posted April 19, 2002 Share Posted April 19, 2002 no no no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ancient Posted April 19, 2002 Share Posted April 19, 2002 its just not fair, rules are rules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts