Guest Clargoa Posted April 18, 2002 Posted April 18, 2002 I don't see the point of having this contest at 96kbps now because people are posting links to their songs encoded at better bitrates...And sure it sounds a lot better than 96kbps. So if you've heard the song at 192kbps and the other at 96kbps it's a whole lot different...
Guest Dexium Posted April 18, 2002 Posted April 18, 2002 You raise a good point Clargoa... maybe next time the artists will have to supply their own webspace... makes sence to me.
Guest ancient Posted April 18, 2002 Posted April 18, 2002 i think the 192 kbps fuckers should b disqualified, 192 is twice the quality god damnit!! its not fair
Guest AgalactiA Posted April 18, 2002 Posted April 18, 2002 ahh I don't care I guess if the track is good, you'll hear it in 96kb/s too - no ?
Guest Andreas of Amygdala Posted April 19, 2002 Posted April 19, 2002 Agreed... And if you use a decent encoder (top of my head: lame), 96kb will sound fine - if your mix does, that is
Recommended Posts