Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok,this is actually off-topic but it's about reviews so...

Do you prefer the reviews forum or the old reviews database?

It's kind of hard to find the releases,artist or tracks you want in a forum.Also database looks more official.What do you think?

Posted

Reviews Database is much better medium than reviews forum cause of better functioning year by year.

Posted

Ok,this is actually off-topic but it's about reviews so...

Do you prefer the reviews forum or the old reviews database?

It's kind of hard to find the releases,artist or tracks you want in a forum.Also database looks more official.What do you think?

208831[/snapback]

Well, I think that what we need is a seperation of reviews (database) and comments (forum). Comments can be good, but has a tendency to only be relevant for a short period of time. If I'm thinking of buying a record I don't want to read posts about mp3's and how labels are hurt buy them, or what has caused the decline in sales. These comments are most of the time relevant at the time they're posted, but a month later they're not, and furthermore they will not help me to decide if this is a good record or not.

 

I guess that what I want is both, as they fill different purposes.

Posted

I don't think there is a doubt between the 2 systems: we ALL agree that a database is a million times better... but in the meantime a forum is the next best thing during the wait for a better database system which will allegedly come one day (hehe this is becomming like all those biblical stories on the comming of the Messiah ;) )

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

What is the problem why can't we have the database review system?

 

because the system we had needed too muc time to update, so we're wating for a more performant system that updates easily...

Posted

I really like the minimal way that the Reviews Database is built. The internet is already flooded with messy stuff everywhere so it's really refreshing to visit the old Psynews database. Review forums is a total chaos in my opinion, so i definately prefer the old reviews database. in fact, i still use it everyday, searching releases, reading opinions about all those good releases (damn i want to express myself there ;).

Posted

the new database's look and feel won't be much different from the old from what I understand. The only thing will be that there will be dynamic pages instead of static. On user-end there won't be much difference but there's a huge difference for the site administrator since the pages will automatically fill in instead of needing lots of hours of work to insert them manually...

Posted

Well, I think that what we need is a seperation of reviews (database) and comments (forum). Comments can be good, but has a tendency to only be relevant for a short period of time. If I'm thinking of buying a record I don't want to read posts about mp3's and how labels are hurt buy them, or what has caused the decline in sales. These comments are most of the time relevant at the time they're posted, but a month later they're not, and furthermore they will not help me to decide if this is a good record or not.

 

I guess that what I want is both, as they fill different purposes.

Well Im with Trolsk on this one, but if I have to choose one of them I'll definetly go for the database. Easy to search both by year and other, and as Trolsk states, when I want to buy a record I want just the review and not all this other nonsense as the mp3 war going on. However I state again that I would like both options.

 

-peace

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...