hypno_spacer Posted July 19, 2005 Posted July 19, 2005 I try to find some good music tracker engine with interface like Cubase, support VST, sounds good and tracker. Because I listen about Madtracker, I try to find some people, who knows this software and let me know about quality of interface, sound output.. related link http://www.madtracker.org/about.php Thanks for critic and view Quote
hypno_spacer Posted July 19, 2005 Author Posted July 19, 2005 Do you have some experience with Mad tracker? Is it real for psytrance music composing? Quote
Time_Trap Posted July 19, 2005 Posted July 19, 2005 i know it was used to make about 70% of all cheesy nitzhonot... imo it's not worth using it... try Reason or Logic or Cubase. all of the above have a good interface... Quote
cryion Posted July 19, 2005 Posted July 19, 2005 u should try buzz tracker probably the best tracker out there which gives the best quality too... Quote
d_vision Posted July 20, 2005 Posted July 20, 2005 MADTRACKER? why men.? do you want to spend your time in midding? check and experimental with this: cubase sx 3 reason (new version) logic (new verion) cakewalk (all sequencers) fruity loops acid pro but dont play with that (madtracker) ps who remember that software....(its bean a long time) cu men Quote
d_vision Posted July 20, 2005 Posted July 20, 2005 u should try buzz tracker probably the best tracker out there which gives the best quality too... 300193[/snapback] BUZZ? best quality? please... let speak SERIOUSLY Its music making forum... Quote
psybrat Posted July 20, 2005 Posted July 20, 2005 ah. . you bring back memories of old days .. true .. trackers were one the begining programs used .. there were days when Erez Eizen and others used trackers to make goatrance .. they made some good stuff .. however with new technology and software .. it is wise to start with Cubase SX, Reason, Logic or so .. yeah, I have used Impulse Tracker at times .. but not it's Reason, Acid Pro, Cubase, etc.. good luck psybrat Quote
Telepatu Posted July 20, 2005 Posted July 20, 2005 I made better music with IT like 7 years ago that anyone of you have made with any Cubase or Logic or Reason or Acid or whatever. No new technology can replace usability of a tracker. Only thing that separates good musician from not that good musician is their music, not their equipment. Tracker is definetly easiest way to make music if you can't play piano. Buzz is dead. Renoise is too FT-retro, although has best quality sound. Madtracker is just clumsy. IT rocks. And all you need is P3 machine! Quote
hypno_spacer Posted August 8, 2005 Author Posted August 8, 2005 you think big machine processor and cpu... or not? Quote
realisation Posted August 12, 2005 Posted August 12, 2005 I'm sorry but its bullshit that cubase has a good interface, its the most irritating interface i've ever used in any sequencer.. PLEASE, not reason, especially the new 3.0 version.. what a pile of shite.. the new effects dont do anything for your sound. the sequencer is pretty pants at putting notes together. Logic is OK, infact its intuitive enough to use, but you cant re-arrange your effects on the fly. madtracker 2.5 is good for putting ideas together quickly.. you can create the same results in this compared to something like reason or logic.. because it now supports VSTi's its on par with any of the other sequencers, the only thing that it cant do is variable note lengths easily, but this can be done using something like automation on the decay, and if you want to record some very complicated keyboard playing and editing that then a linear sequencer like logic is the way to go. logic and madtracker (and ableton live) for me.. the rest is just drivel.. Quote
Time_Trap Posted August 13, 2005 Posted August 13, 2005 PLEASE, not reason, especially the new 3.0 version.. what a pile of shite.. the new effects dont do anything for your sound. the sequencer is pretty pants at putting notes together. what do you mean? it's true it doesnt have any new effects , but it has better mastering devices [MCLASS] and the Combinator device... it's not that bad Quote
Frontier Psychiatrist Posted August 14, 2005 Posted August 14, 2005 I made better music with IT like 7 years ago that anyone of you have made with any Cubase or Logic or Reason or Acid or whatever. No new technology can replace usability of a tracker. Only thing that separates good musician from not that good musician is their music, not their equipment. Tracker is definetly easiest way to make music if you can't play piano. Buzz is dead. Renoise is too FT-retro, although has best quality sound. Madtracker is just clumsy. IT rocks. And all you need is P3 machine! 300899[/snapback] LOL. Do you have electricity in the cave you are living in? Quote
hypno_spacer Posted August 16, 2005 Author Posted August 16, 2005 Thanks Guys, I think many peoples used before trackers doesn't support this one good of peace - TRACKERS. Anyone can sayS: its not good for quantazing.. is it really nonrealizable? I think, no. Its only other style of arranging notes and I think, easiest way to make something. About interface: I don't know, if Cubase has better interface, but I think on many peoples, on many trackers and composers and ask myself, why it would be wrong way? Is it too hard make some tracker interface on Cubase (and make tracks there) or make good one peace of tracker with good interface (like has Cubase I think) and lets go:) Quote
Mindfly Posted August 18, 2005 Posted August 18, 2005 Being an old tracker-crazed-maniac I'd go for Modplug-tracker. www.modplug.com NB: This is a serious answer. Quote
Guest Posted August 21, 2005 Posted August 21, 2005 You should try renoise tracker - the best tracker ever! www.renoise.com btw i used FT2 for a long time - oldshool! Quote
Negrosex Posted August 21, 2005 Posted August 21, 2005 I made better music with IT like 7 years ago that anyone of you have made with any Cubase or Logic or Reason or Acid or whatever. No new technology can replace usability of a tracker. Only thing that separates good musician from not that good musician is their music, not their equipment. Tracker is definetly easiest way to make music if you can't play piano. Buzz is dead. Renoise is too FT-retro, although has best quality sound. Madtracker is just clumsy. IT rocks. And all you need is P3 machine! 300899[/snapback] Did you really need a P3 to run Impulse Tracker? If i remember correctly i didn't have more than a 486 and IT worked fine. 1 Quote
DarkAngel Posted September 11, 2015 Posted September 11, 2015 Only thing that separates good musician from not that good musician is their music, not their equipment. yep! Quote
DarkAngel Posted September 13, 2015 Posted September 13, 2015 Did you really need a P3 to run Impulse Tracker? If i remember correctly i didn't have more than a 486 and IT worked fine. it's awesome on DOS! Quote
DarkAngel Posted September 15, 2015 Posted September 15, 2015 Octamed is also recommended to the Amiga computer , which I work on my Music with. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.