Tatsu Posted July 22, 2005 Share Posted July 22, 2005 Ì have a questino for the vinyl collectors (I bet Ukiro and/or Basilisk can help me): spoken in general what is worh more: original releasees or promos and white lables? Or maybe there is no general rule and it depends only on the number of printed white labels and original copies? Well, I know it sure depends on that anyway but as I said I'd like to know if there is a general rule besides that. Thanks for all infos! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Basilisk Posted July 22, 2005 Share Posted July 22, 2005 I think white labels are considered prestigious in other scenes, but here in the land of Goa we've got some smarts and realize that with an actual commercial release you get a nice fancy cover most of the time, and overall the aesthetic is much more geared to a collector... however - I could be wrong. Personally I've tried to get rid of every white label I ever managed to pick up (mostly second hand when the seller didn't bother to inform me) because I think they're shit. Of course for releases for which there is only promos, that's the way to go. Generally I think the obsession with white labels (which I am most familiar with from "regular" trance fans) seems idiotic. Rarrrr! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatsu Posted July 23, 2005 Author Share Posted July 23, 2005 Thanks for the FAAAAAST info... I have some white lables but I don't care much about them either, even if they are in nice sleeves (with nice pictures I mean). Mainly because if they arent marked I don't know what tracks are on it or on which side is what. But I don't mind buying them when I see an interesting track on it, like on Ebay. Anyway, nice to know that it's not really attractive to go for white lables. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.