sherlockalien Posted December 20, 2005 Posted December 20, 2005 It's not about being a designer or not. The thing disturbing me at this thread is the lapidary statements to some of the work. Even when you people think the design or idea is stupid – than you should make a statement, which is contentfull and not only raving. Sorry if you feel attacked by the reply. L.T. HOF'99 401319[/snapback] if you want to read serious completely and always constructive posts, where there is never anything that could ever be considered remotely offensive even by the most oldschool religious dogmatic moralist grandmas, then maybe psynews is not the place for you.. this thread is named ´stupid covers´.. its about having fun and making fun of covers we think sucks.. We are not trying to change the world of cover arts here, and be all impartial and politically correct... we just having some fun... so relax, be positive and post some stupid covers yourself Quote
LawranceTaylor Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 if you want to read serious completely and always constructive posts 401366[/snapback] "Blaaaaaah" Where are these posts, you are talking about The thread-name doesn't implicate nothing that you said. The only thing that sucks here are the stupid comments. So get "yourself" relaxed kid and write rather something positive. And don't forget: It's grandmas like me, which helped to build up this whole thing the past 15 years. So this forum is also a place for proactive grandmas, rather than for bullshitting teens. Go play! "Grandma" LT Quote
LawranceTaylor Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Yes exactly. But I can bet I could make something better than the Turtles cover. 400822[/snapback] After i viewed this pretty funny layouts from the RajaRam-Series you did, i can believe that. Not the same with some others on the forum. Quote
amphiton Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Looks like some old videogame cover 401430[/snapback] Actually thats a pretty known backdrop don't know who's exactly, but seen it hundred times on party pix from Sweden. Quote
DeathPosture Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Actually thats a pretty known backdrop don't know who's exactly, but seen it hundred times on party pix from Sweden. 401695[/snapback] It's NOS... Classic backdroop indeed - in Denmark too where NOS often does deco... Quote
~Blue leprechaun~ Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 It's not about being a designer or not. The thing disturbing me at this thread is the lapidary statements to some of the work. Even when you people think the design or idea is stupid – than you should make a statement, which is contentfull and not only raving. Sorry if you feel attacked by the reply. L.T. HOF'99 401319[/snapback] it's pure black humor my friend, a sort of humor psynews users share... don't take it serious, it's like a bunch of guys sitting in a park laughing at an old lady (you don't do that) but héy nobody hears it... see ???? Quote
LawranceTaylor Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 it's pure black humor my friend, 401705[/snapback] Then maybe the thread should be called different, no matter which shade your humor has. I have simply another opinion on this. And contrary to the most people reading and answering this thread, my interest here is related to my work. So i'm eager to read sometimes something usefull, rather than only noncompetent jokes. And kid, beware of people which claim themself to have humor! The old lady from the park. Quote
~Blue leprechaun~ Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Then maybe the thread should be called different, no matter which shade your humor has. I have simply another opinion on this. And contrary to the most people reading and answering this thread, my interest here is related to my work. So i'm eager to read sometimes something usefull, rather than only noncompetent jokes. And kid, beware of people which claim themself to have humor! The old lady from the park. 401722[/snapback] you just don't share our vision about humor that's it... no big deal, we are all differents... but in psynews people got the feeling there were so many stupid covers comparing earlier times they started a thread about it and now every stupid cover release get's posted... we have a good cover thread too my friend use the search... don't judge on one moments Quote
Guest Elysium Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 It's grandmas like me, which helped to build up this whole thing the past 15 years. So this forum is also a place for proactive grandmas, rather than for bullshitting teens. Go play! "Grandma" LT 401687[/snapback] And I am not a Kid too and I say... "let's make as many jokes as possible about stupid silly covers". Especially the ones with posing "superstars". I am sure since you are one of those who build the scene that you can agree on one thing. The vision of this scene was not to see "superstars" pose on Covers. Quote
Cinos Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 It takes 5 minutes to make a better cover concept than the ones in this thread, and another 5 mintues to complete it. The ones posted here obvious weren't thought through at all. Examples on bland ideas that still pwn everything in this thread: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v298/Cinos/cdcover.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v298/Cinos/Fractal2.jpg The point of the thread is that covers that clearly took less than 30 seconds to make deserve to be laughed at. Quote
Sawfly Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Actually thats a pretty known backdrop don't know who's exactly, but seen it hundred times on party pix from Sweden. 401695[/snapback] Huh, looks too 80's to me Quote
LawranceTaylor Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 I know the threads related to coverdesign, don't have to teach me. What's more discusting than the comments, is that you people argue with me, which is the way i have to look at his thread?! And again: do a usefull coment and sometimes a funny, but don't slip away into pure nonsens! Lawrance T. HOF'99 Quote
LawranceTaylor Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Especially the ones with posing "superstars". 401730[/snapback] ?????????????????????? Hmm????????????????? Talking about what???? Quote
~Blue leprechaun~ Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 I know the threads related to coverdesign, don't have to teach me. 401746[/snapback] wooow you are thinking I try to teach you mmmmmmmmm I was just trying to help... it think you're a bit mad dont' know exactly why but will stop posting here... never ment to teach you something Quote
Trolsk Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 It's grandmas like me, which helped to build up this whole thing the past 15 years. So this forum is also a place for proactive grandmas, rather than for bullshitting teens. 401687[/snapback] Hey Grandma LT, I'd really like to know about your contributions "which helped to build up this whole thing the past 15 years". Quote
LawranceTaylor Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Hey Grandma LT, I'd really like to know about your contributions "which helped to build up this whole thing the past 15 years". 401776[/snapback] Oh Trolsk, old enemy – it's you again! Listen kid: just because you have wrote a few rewievs, you are not in the position to ask me what i have done for the scene. If you were more symphatic to me i would tell you the name behind my avatar and the next thing you would say is: ahhhh, i've heard about this guy. But we're fighting since the beginning of this thread, so i'm not interested. Simply FO! Quote
Trolsk Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Oh Trolsk, old enemy – it's you again! Listen kid: just because you have wrote a few rewievs, you are not in the position to ask me what i have done for the scene. Enemy? LOL. You're just too much. You're the one claiming to be one of the psy-trance grandmas, if you can't back up your claims you should just shut up, that's pretty obvious isn't it? Otherwise any of us could claim we're the grandparents of psytrance, and expecting us to obey or conform because you claim to be some important person isn't very cool. If you were more symphatic to me i would tell you the name behind my avatar and the next thing you would say is: ahhhh, i've heard about this guy. As far as I can recall you told us in your first post to this forum what we were allowed to do and not to do, that's not very symphatic if you ask me. If you crash into a thread and provide flawed arguments then you should expect to be flamed. Your argumentation never went further then "since you're not designers you are not allowed to criticize the works of designers". Quote
Frontier Psychiatrist Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 I think some people here need to install an "ego limiter" plug in in their photoshop. Bahhh. Quote
LawranceTaylor Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 Enemy? LOL. You're just too much. if you can't back up your claims you should just shut up, 401843[/snapback] No need to proove to you what i have done the last few years. When we should meet ever because of any coincidence, than you should bring with you some time and i will show you all of it. I did my part in producing things and bring projects to life. And afterwards it's not my part to do a proper critic about it. LT Quote
sherlockalien Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 I think some people here need to install an "ego limiter" plug in in their photoshop. 401854[/snapback] may i second that? Quote
Ov3rdos3 Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 I think some people here need to install an "ego limiter" plug in in their photoshop. Bahhh. 401854[/snapback] I would, but my "genital" plug-in is taking up most of the space on my harddrive. Quote
Frontier Psychiatrist Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 I would, but my "genital" plug-in is taking up most of the space on my harddrive. 402016[/snapback] You can always scan the registry for redundant devices. Quote
Ov3rdos3 Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 You can always scan the registry for redundant devices. 402033[/snapback] just did. the genital-plug in came up. Quote
Majoony Posted December 21, 2005 Posted December 21, 2005 just did. the genital-plug in came up. 402039[/snapback] Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.