euchkuh Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 at last, i had some expectations after hearing computech and border line, and ive got to say, they didnt disappoint me. great album some1 listened to it yet? cuz it wasnt released in psyshop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esu Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 yes almost made me puke Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillyTheSquid Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 I liked the album a lot... very danceable, lots of tricks and twists. Can't see how this would make anyone puke, though. Maybe this album causes a bad reaction in those who have drunk too much alcohol? They should put a warning label on it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritual om Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
esu Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 Very standard full on.. just dipped with ugly singing and guitars. No thanks! It's mostly the remixes they should have let out of the album. Never been a big fan of putting remixes on full artist albums anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euchkuh Posted December 6, 2005 Author Share Posted December 6, 2005 i disagree, it mey not be a very unique full on, but its not standard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benf52 Posted December 6, 2005 Share Posted December 6, 2005 they definitely have the skills... their production is getting better and better... but i don't like the direction they r going nowadays... did not like the samples at all... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slinky Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Not very standard at all, you're nuts. The lyrics rhyme and flow very well, with a nice touch of guitar. Very melodic. 'havn't finished listening to the album yet but, the 1st track was a big suprise compared to their first cd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 its out now! http://www.trance-shop.com/de/catalog/prod...roducts_id=5088 or get it together with the new IsrAliens 5 http://www.trance-shop.com/de/catalog/prod...roducts_id=5089 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonflier Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 Full on + lyrics + guitar = ROxxorZZZ!!! Honestly, worst combination ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Cocco Posted December 8, 2005 Share Posted December 8, 2005 It's now available on psyshop and yes, that opening song Dirtbag, sound terrible because of the cheesy lyrics! ("I'm a liar, set things on fire.") Wtf??? It sounds like some crappy Limp Bizkit song that never made the cut to Limp Bizkits 2003 most disappointing album to date. What the hell is a song like that doing as the opening song of Psycrafts new album?!?! It's a big turn-off. Stick to psytrance guys!!! This album could have started off with a cool downtempo sound before those cheesy lyrics began. There are like better ways to sell your music and get recogntion. IM has a huge name. You don't. Be original. And for the record, if you're gonna have singing, make it NOT CHEESY. Since when did singing like a country singer lyrics that go "I'm a Liar... I set things on fire" sound cool??? It sounds dated and what are we listening to, soft rock or psytrance? I think it's humorous how the paragraph for their album at psyshop says that the opening song (with lyrics) was mixed by none other than Infected Mushroom) lol.. like thats some amazing thing now that IM is becoming more of a joke to their original fans in general. IM's name sounds more infamous now than famous due to the controversial direction they've taken. If I was a psytrance artist, I don't know if I'd want to have IM's name attached to my album unless they really made it awesome, which the opening track IM supposedly mixed here, is anything but. http://www.psyshop.com/shop/CDs/hom/hom1cd045.html Anyway, speaking of the actual psycraft - computech album. Track 9 (Night drive) also sounds cool with those chopped up female voices. I like how they cut the voices up and made it sound like a melody. Some of it (tracks 3, 6) sound darker and more aggressive like their previous album, NEW MOVES, which I unquestionably find their best album of the three and it's actually pretty good. I don't remember any singing on their last album. However this one I'm not so sure about. Many psytrancers will find the first song is a big turn-off, which is why I'm a bit surprised as to why they made a singing track their first song. Is it just me of is singing THAT popular in psytrance? I find it RARELY works. For example, The Moon track in TALPA is how to do it correctly. If you can actually make it through the first track without setting yourself on fire, it doesn't sound bad -- after the first track. However, I don't think it sounds good either. Several tracks seem pretty cool, and thats just based on samples. I do own their previous album NEW MOVES and I really like it. See samples for NEW MOVES below. The tone and feel is wild and darker on their last album. Some of the melodies were catchy, with several very creative moments, and the voice and fx samples I remember being chaotic and intense. I liked that very much on their last album and this one sounds more general, it's taking less risks, more full on, etc.. http://www.psyshop.com/shop/CDs/hom/hom1cd033.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ritual om Posted December 9, 2005 Share Posted December 9, 2005 i must check it out...i must admit that i am very negatively predisposed... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euchkuh Posted December 9, 2005 Author Share Posted December 9, 2005 What the hell is a song like that doing as the opening song of Psycrafts new album?!?! It's a big turn-off. i disagree, the lyrics may be cheesy, but the song in general is good. i think it could fit better in the end, but it didnt disturb me to much. p.s. imo this album is way better then new moves, that was a standard full on and purchasing it was a waste. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
advance Posted January 29, 2006 Share Posted January 29, 2006 Why did PsyCraft choose to remix Brad Sucks? What's the connection? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euchkuh Posted January 29, 2006 Author Share Posted January 29, 2006 dunno, but it came out preety good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riton Posted January 29, 2006 Share Posted January 29, 2006 clubby and cheesy... but all in all, i've heard much... MUCH worse stuff... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuse Posted January 29, 2006 Share Posted January 29, 2006 i disagree, it mey not be a very unique full on, but its not standard. 394190[/snapback] I experienced it as standard too and nothing special it's very subtle morning fullon and that's the kind of morning fullon I like but still didn't like this one at all so Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khogg Posted February 4, 2006 Share Posted February 4, 2006 Thanks Israel for confirming that all your established psytrance artists suck ass. In the rest of the world, we were wondering, but now we know. They all want to be pop stars. They all want to be a crisper version of the shitty new IM sound. Buy this now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
euchkuh Posted February 4, 2006 Author Share Posted February 4, 2006 Thanks Israel for confirming that all your established psytrance artists suck ass. In the rest of the world, we were wondering, but now we know. They all want to be pop stars. They all want to be a crisper version of the shitty new IM sound. Buy this now. 432908[/snapback] ure generalization is ridiculous Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khogg Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 Yes... true. None the less. This is awful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.