shpongled Posted May 11, 2003 Posted May 11, 2003 Ukiro, are you trying to compensate something... ;P Quote
traveller Posted May 11, 2003 Posted May 11, 2003 depends what i'm on.. 8.9" (1024x480) with XWIDE™ ..very rarely 17" 1024x768 ..IE or Nautilus Quote
Guest ukiro Posted May 11, 2003 Posted May 11, 2003 shpongled: hahaha, not that I'm aware of ;-) running dual monitors is VERY nice (I can't imagine being without it now), and since I have two high quality 19" screens (one Nokia and one Sony) I push the resolution as high as I can. Beyond 1600x1200 a 19" is too small though, and my graphics card cant go higher with decent refresh rates anyway, at least not while running dual screens. Quote
shpongled Posted May 11, 2003 Posted May 11, 2003 Hehe.. ok. Dual monitor system would be nice.... I have thought about that but have no money to spend for extra monitor. First I thought you ment one monitor is running at 3200x1200... I was wondering how anybody can read any text with that high res... lol stjuupid me... 8P Quote
alpha Posted May 11, 2003 Posted May 11, 2003 my 17" broke down so now i've got 15" 1024*768 and IE Quote
Guest massive_yak Posted May 11, 2003 Posted May 11, 2003 17" (flatscreen oh yeah) 1024 x 768 ie Quote
Guest massive_yak Posted May 11, 2003 Posted May 11, 2003 17" (flatscreen oh yeah) 1024 x 768 ie Quote
Guest >--<SenstatuX>-- Posted May 14, 2003 Posted May 14, 2003 21" 1600x1200 (flat screan) ;-) yea,, im a ritch mufu.. so? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.