Starkraver Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 What do you guys think of Artists or labels self rating their own releases on Discogs.? obviously it is going to be a 5 star rating regardless of the quality of the release. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychedelic chipmunk Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Kinda beats the purpose of the rating system. You publish your work to find out people's opinion on it, good or ill. Such practice makes me heavily prejudiced, at the very minimum, to be honest. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkraver Posted September 16, 2016 Author Share Posted September 16, 2016 Kinda beats the purpose of the rating system. You publish your work to find out people's opinion on it, good or ill. Such practice makes me heavily prejudiced, at the very minimum, to be honest. exactly how I feel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agneton Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Suppose this scene was huuuuge and each release would gather at least 2000-5000 rates, the impact of a label rating its own releases wouldn't influence the score so much. My opinion: rating your own music = not done. All the rest is OK or OK-ish. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychedelic chipmunk Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Suppose this scene was huuuuge and each release would gather at least 2000-5000 rates, the impact of a label rating its own releases wouldn't influence the score so much. My opinion: rating your own music = not done. All the rest is OK or OK-ish. You're right about it being insignificant when the numbers are huge, but one potential issue still crops up here: credibility. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starkraver Posted September 16, 2016 Author Share Posted September 16, 2016 Suppose this scene was huuuuge and each release would gather at least 2000-5000 rates, the impact of a label rating its own releases wouldn't influence the score so much. My opinion: rating your own music = not done. All the rest is OK or OK-ish. Good to see a label owner understanding and appreciating the point of rating system Cheers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitrinos Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 Yeah guys I also think you should stop rating your own releases. It raises the score for about 0.01-0.03 points and holds you in contempt by some. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psychedelic chipmunk Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 It's not about numbers, I think, rather, the principle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anoebis Posted September 16, 2016 Share Posted September 16, 2016 I have no idea why the credibility would become less if the label releases music they love from the heart... Its simple,if a label releases a release, I guess he is in love with it... And in my case it is very simple. I have a points-system in my computer with every release I own. And all releases I have get a rating on discogs from 1/5 till 5/5. As I rate all, it would be dull not to include Suntrip releases or releases I worked on (which are many more as just the Suntrip stuff) So yes, logically speaking we won't release music we don't like, so it means a 5/5 score... If that makes me less credible, so be it, I just give honest points to all goa-trance I own Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitrinos Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 Are you honestly saying that ALL Suntrip releases are 5/5? I'm sure there are some you like more than others. When it comes to one's own releases, the judgement can't be nothing but biased. It's just how it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celaripo Posted September 17, 2016 Share Posted September 17, 2016 I have no idea why the credibility would become less if the label releases music they love from the heart... Its simple,if a label releases a release, I guess he is in love with it... And in my case it is very simple. I have a points-system in my computer with every release I own. And all releases I have get a rating on discogs from 1/5 till 5/5. As I rate all, it would be dull not to include Suntrip releases or releases I worked on (which are many more as just the Suntrip stuff) So yes, logically speaking we won't release music we don't like, so it means a 5/5 score... If that makes me less credible, so be it, I just give honest points to all goa-trance I own so you mean you would not have released zirrex - lost in time 3cd album if they asked you? since you gave it 4 stars and not 5 stars 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anoebis Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 Let me first explain my points system:I rate EVERY track on EVERY cd I have, if a track gets 7 or 8 = * = 1 point, if it gets 9 or 10 it gets ** = 2 points, if it gets less then 7 it gets a / = 0 pointsif you have 9 tracks and you have 9 points or more = 5/5 (so actually, if a cd is SUPERB, it can have 15 points out of 9 tracks)This IS a problem with 2-3CD releases, as chances are small it gets 5/5, as usually there are several tracks that get a 0... This is the case with the Zirrex-CD, not ALL the tracks on the 3 cds are super good and get an average of 1 point per track for me...As for the Suntrip releases, of course I favour some above others... But as said, a release can have an average of 1 point (9 tracks and 9 points), but also an average of 1.33 for instance (9 tracks and 13 points). They would both get 5/5, but still, the other is "better" And its pretty simple, I would never release a cd that would net get 5/5 in my points-system... Sometimes, in the end, you realise some tracks may be less good, but still... and if I think about it, maybe 2 releases deserve rather a 4/5 after relistening them 100 times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richpa Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 In the end numbers doesn't have the same value as a written word or review. One of the reasons why Psynews still is the best place where you can discover great music. When I created Discogs account I rated few releases by Neogoa, but in the end I decided it's better to keep my opinion just for Psynews and if I feel that some release deserves my attention I would rather post few words about it and why I like it. For example, Ektoplazm also has 5-star rating system but I never seen it as something super objective, most of our releases are over 90% positive rating but in the reality some of them aren't that great to wide number of people, I understand that and it would be silly to say otherwise, but that doesn't mean that thoose same releases might not be great to certain people and vice versa.My opinion, about rating systems in general is that review and written word brings much more value and attention to certain release. It's also one of the reasons why Metal Encyclopedia has amazing rating system, you can rate release from 0-100% but with review besides it, so you can actually see why people like or dislike certain release and in general you learn much more about music besides just numbers (no matter from whom they're coming). I really hope Psynews and all great folks who are taking their time to overview certain releases will continue to happen because from a perspecive of music fan and someone who releases music, it's the best and most objective way to find great and avoid bad music.Just my 0,02$ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrAnarchy Posted September 18, 2016 Share Posted September 18, 2016 I think the problem here isnt if a LABEL rates its own release, but if the ARTIST does so. Which I havent encountered. I think that Anoebis' rate is credible no matter if he released the album or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kitrinos Posted October 13, 2016 Share Posted October 13, 2016 Well said Richpa. For some, something like 4/5 is very very good, while for some others it's just ok. Numbers don't say anything, giving a description (even a short one) is much more valuable. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.