antic604 Posted May 30, 2017 Posted May 30, 2017 The bells around 1:00 - 2:00 are great, so is the melody coming in at 2:40, but too bad it doesn't get expanded upon. The following part returns to the dissonant, false-sounding elements from the intro, then it gets interesting again around 4:00 and even better at 5:15, when it gains some tempo and energy. It gets slightly muddy around 5:40, due to some frequency clashing on the off-beats, so maybe some EQ-ing would help there? Wish the bells would return somewhere at the end around 7:30 I think the drums should be more pronounced, i.e. the kick is barely heard. Personally I also am not fond of the high-pitched K-BBK-BB type of bassline, but that's my taste. Overall, I really liked it with the exception of intro and the part in the middle (3:05 - 4:00), which - to me, at least - sound false. Subscribed to your SC 1 Quote
Harelk1 Posted May 31, 2017 Author Posted May 31, 2017 The bells around 1:00 - 2:00 are great, so is the melody coming in at 2:40, but too bad it doesn't get expanded upon. The following part returns to the dissonant, false-sounding elements from the intro, then it gets interesting again around 4:00 and even better at 5:15, when it gains some tempo and energy. It gets slightly muddy around 5:40, due to some frequency clashing on the off-beats, so maybe some EQ-ing would help there? Wish the bells would return somewhere at the end around 7:30 I think the drums should be more pronounced, i.e. the kick is barely heard. Personally I also am not fond of the high-pitched K-BBK-BB type of bassline, but that's my taste. Overall, I really liked it with the exception of intro and the part in the middle (3:05 - 4:00), which - to me, at least - sound false. Subscribed to your SC Thanks for your opinion and Subscription ♥ 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.