Jump to content

soundforge 6


Guest

Recommended Posts

I would recomend old SF4.5 or 5 rather than SF6. SF6 lacks of batch processing, undo disabling, direct-mode operation, and other useful things. Though it can operate with 192khz and 24 bit samples, rendering works in background, plugins can be chained just like in SFVegas, and has very smart system of undestructible editing (e.g. deleting some portion from middle of wav doesn't take any time). Anyway despite of these benefits, i still prefer my old good SF4.5.

 

"It is good not the best ... but good"

------

So what in your opinion is better than SF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Guest BeaSingha

Well..

 

is a good software or not for produce music????

 

it is an Editing tool not a producing tool ... Wavlab 4.0 is better in cutting and stuff but u have more options in SF ... and i have to agree thet the best version is 4.5 of SF ... i have both 4.5 and 6.0 ... ... 6.0 have many buggs but not 4.5 .. and some of the extensions does not work in 6.0 ...

 

so get 4.5 ... ;)

 

Cubase is a little better then SoundForge ... in my eye ... or is it ?? hehe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...